<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Hack In The Box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hackinthebox.net/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hackinthebox.net</link>
	<description>Hacking and Computer security news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:56:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Sites Hacked by GrowSmartBusiness Widget by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hackinthebox.net/malware/web-sites-hacked-by-growsmartbusiness-widget.html/comment-page-1#comment-2382</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackinthebox.net/misc/web-sites-hacked-by-growsmartbusiness-widget.html#comment-2382</guid>
		<description>Susan, Thanks for the update, we&#039;ll keep an eye on NetSol official blog for updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, Thanks for the update, we&#8217;ll keep an eye on NetSol official blog for updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Sites Hacked by GrowSmartBusiness Widget by Susan Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.hackinthebox.net/malware/web-sites-hacked-by-growsmartbusiness-widget.html/comment-page-1#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackinthebox.net/misc/web-sites-hacked-by-growsmartbusiness-widget.html#comment-2368</guid>
		<description>Hi, I am with Network Solutions and want to assure you that we are working on this issue and have additional clarifications and updates at http://bit.ly/9g5qv4 Please note that this has NOT affected 5M sites as reported online. Our preliminary analysis is that the potential affected under construction web pages was less than 120k around the time of detection of the malware.  Please visit http://bit.ly/9g5qv4 for frequent updates and a FAQ on the issue.  –Susan Wade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am with Network Solutions and want to assure you that we are working on this issue and have additional clarifications and updates at <a href="http://bit.ly/9g5qv4" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9g5qv4</a> Please note that this has NOT affected 5M sites as reported online. Our preliminary analysis is that the potential affected under construction web pages was less than 120k around the time of detection of the malware.  Please visit <a href="http://bit.ly/9g5qv4" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9g5qv4</a> for frequent updates and a FAQ on the issue.  –Susan Wade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft ships rush patch for Windows shortcut bug by Czerno</title>
		<link>http://www.hackinthebox.net/malware/microsoft-ships-rush-patch-for-windows-shortcut-bug.html/comment-page-1#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>Czerno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackinthebox.net/misc/microsoft-ships-rush-patch-for-windows-shortcut-bug.html#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>Disgusting attitude of MS; compare year 2001, security bulletin MS-01-017; is that the same Microsoft ?

&quot;We have waived normal support guidelines to provide remediation for all operating systems that are still in widespread use, regardless of whether they are normally supported or not.&quot;

And notice how they were providing the update for &quot;unsupported&quot; OSes, despite the fact that the error was not even theirs. This time the flaw is but a monstrous blunder by MS prgorammers, and yet they wouldn&#039;t update &quot;old&quot; OSes, even though those OSes were still under support at the time they were working on the fix ? Disgusting, no ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disgusting attitude of MS; compare year 2001, security bulletin MS-01-017; is that the same Microsoft ?</p>
<p>&#8220;We have waived normal support guidelines to provide remediation for all operating systems that are still in widespread use, regardless of whether they are normally supported or not.&#8221;</p>
<p>And notice how they were providing the update for &#8220;unsupported&#8221; OSes, despite the fact that the error was not even theirs. This time the flaw is but a monstrous blunder by MS prgorammers, and yet they wouldn&#8217;t update &#8220;old&#8221; OSes, even though those OSes were still under support at the time they were working on the fix ? Disgusting, no ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alleged $100M scareware sellers facing charges by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hackinthebox.net/malware/alleged-100m-scareware-sellers-facing-charges.html/comment-page-1#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 23:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. Take a look at some of Dancho Danchevs posts over at http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/ he clearly outlines links between a lot of the scareware, malware and most other online criminal activity to the same couple of groups</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. Take a look at some of Dancho Danchevs posts over at <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/</a> he clearly outlines links between a lot of the scareware, malware and most other online criminal activity to the same couple of groups</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alleged $100M scareware sellers facing charges by j davis</title>
		<link>http://www.hackinthebox.net/malware/alleged-100m-scareware-sellers-facing-charges.html/comment-page-1#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>j davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-132</guid>
		<description>These are not &#039;alleged&#039; scammers. Last year Reno settled with the FTC for a mere $160,000. One blogger managed to view some of reno&#039;s instant messages where he brags about the fake scans and his many trips to the Ukraine to meet with these cyber criminals. Hopefullt all concerned will get the max on each count and the sentences will run consecutively!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are not &#8216;alleged&#8217; scammers. Last year Reno settled with the FTC for a mere $160,000. One blogger managed to view some of reno&#8217;s instant messages where he brags about the fake scans and his many trips to the Ukraine to meet with these cyber criminals. Hopefullt all concerned will get the max on each count and the sentences will run consecutively!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
